Every night Silver Warden reads your website the way search engines and AI assistants read it, puts 300+ specialists to work on what it finds, and has a verified list waiting for your team in the morning: what broke, what to fix, and what is actually fixed.
Your pages are no longer read only by Googlebot. Answer boxes lift a paragraph, AI assistants summarise instead of linking, and each of them reads the page differently. Silver Warden checks all three on the same pages, in the same run.
Can search engines reach, index and understand every page?
Can an answer engine quote the page directly?
Do AI assistants get the page your customers get?
While your team sleeps, Silver Warden reads, checks, reconciles and reports. By morning the list is ready, and every line on it can be traced back to what the crawler saw.
A budget of pages per site, fetched the way a search engine fetches them. The sample rotates, pages never read first and then the ones read longest ago, so the whole site takes its turn. A status sweep covers a wider set of URLs.
300+ specialists in six families go over what was read. Each template is fetched again as AI crawlers, and the two versions of the page are compared.
Every finding has a stable identity. New problems open, fixed ones close only after a re-read, and a problem that comes back is flagged as a regression.
The control center is updated, the night's summary is written, and a watchdog flags what needs attention: new critical findings, sudden spikes, a site that could not be read.
A monitoring tool is only as useful as its list is believable. Silver Warden keeps the list short, stable and verifiable.
A finding is closed only when the crawler has gone back to the pages in scope and the problem is gone. The closure keeps a receipt: which pages were re-read, and what they showed.
When a fixed problem comes back it is not a new finding. It reopens as a regression, with the date it was closed, at the top of the morning report.
When the team marks a finding done, the crawler keeps looking. If it still sees the problem on the next night, the finding says so instead of quietly disappearing.
Every specialist is tested against a site with planted defects and against a corpus of healthy pages that must stay clean. Every run is stamped with the engine version and a fingerprint of the catalogue, so a change in the numbers can be told apart from a change in the rules.
Each specialist watches for one kind of problem, and every finding it raises carries a stable identity, a severity and the team that owns the fix. The catalogue is versioned with the engine, so this month's results can be compared with last month's.
Can it be crawled and indexed?
Does each page say what it is?
Can machines read the facts?
Do AI crawlers get the real page?
Can an answer engine quote it?
What does Google show that the crawl missed?
Every finding is ranked, so the team starts from what costs most: Critical High Medium Low
The control center is where the night's work becomes your team's day: sorted by severity, grouped by template, with a proposed fix on the page where it applies.
| Severity | Finding | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | AI crawlers receive an empty pagetemplate: listing | New |
| High | Price missing from product markuptemplate: product | Regressed |
| High | Pages with impressions the crawl never reached14 URLs | Open |
| Medium | Meta description missing/stores/ | Still detected |
| Low | Canonical missing on blog posts/blog/ | Resolved (check) |
Page-level proposals: the title to rewrite, the tag to add, the structured data to complete.
Export the open work for one team, as Markdown for tickets or CSV for spreadsheets.
A health score per site, and real-user LCP, INP and CLS from the Chrome UX Report.
Open findings night after night, by severity, with the team's notes on the days that matter, such as a release or a campaign going live.
Statuses and comments shared by the whole team: done, false positive, won't fix, snoozed.
Run the control center under your product name and colours, and give each user only the domains they need.
Every page is a node, every internal link a line, and depth is measured from the home page. Switch to Analyze and the pages with open problems light up by severity.
Each template gets an AI visibility score, and the same graph feeds a proposed llms.txt, built from the pages that matter and ready to review.
Silver Warden reads public pages only, from outside, and behaves the way you would want a crawler to behave on your own site.
How the crawler identifies itself, and how to limit itSEO makes a page reachable and understandable for search engines. AEO shapes the content so that an answer engine can quote it directly. GEO makes sure generative AI assistants receive the same content your visitors see, and are allowed to use it. Silver Warden checks all three on the same pages, in the same run.
Every night. Each run reads a budget of pages that rotates through the site, pages never read first, and a status sweep covers a wider set of URLs. New findings, closures and regressions are in the control center by morning.
No. Silver Warden reads your public pages from outside, as a search engine does. Core Web Vitals come from the public Chrome UX Report, and Search Console data can be added to find pages that Google shows but the crawl has not reached.
It keeps to a few connections per host with a pause between requests, honours Crawl-delay, and stops for that host on a 403, a 429 or a challenge page. The crawler page explains how to limit it or block it with robots.txt.
Only when the crawler has re-read the pages in scope and the problem is gone, and the closure keeps a receipt of what was seen. If the team marks a finding done while the crawler still sees it, the control center says so, and a closed problem that comes back reopens as a regression.
Templates are fetched as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot and compared with the page the main crawl receives. Your robots.txt policy is mapped for 15 AI crawlers, from training bots to live assistants, and checked for contradictions.
SEO, content and engineering teams that run large websites, such as e-commerce catalogues, store networks and service providers, where thousands of templated pages change every week and one broken template can cost more than any single page.
Yes. The control center can run under your product name, tagline and colours, and each user sees only the domains assigned to them, so an agency can give every client a view of its own sites and nothing else.
Tell us about the site you want watched, and we will walk you through the control center.